You may use again the same filters for a different check Var res3 = text.filter(data => data.includes(conditions) & data.includes(conditions)) filter(data => data.includes(conditions) || data.includes(conditions) || data.includes(conditions)) Ĭonsole.log(res1) // filter(data => data.includes(conditions) || data.includes(conditions) || data.includes(conditions)) filter() works with an array and returns a filtered array (which I find easier to use too). Like if you want to use the same filters for all of your checks.Īctually. That means that you can detect if the array includes a NaN.Not the best answer and not the cleanest, but I think it's more permissive. Unlike array indexOf(), which uses Strict Equality Comparison, it includes comparisons using the SameValueZero equality algorithm. Instead, it returns the first index of the element found in the array or will return -1 (which represents that the element is not found). indexOf() to determine whether the element is present in the array. It returns the boolean value: true or false. ![]() The includes() method determines whether the element is included in the array. The Array.includes() method was introduced in ECMAScript 6. Difference between Array.includes() and Array.indexOf() ![]() If the start position is negative, the computed index is calculated as a position in an array to search for the element.Īn entire array will be searched if the computed index is less or equal to -1 * array.length. Therefore, the array will not be searched. ![]() The output of the above code is the following.įalse is returned if the start position is greater than or equal to the array’s length. Console.log(.includes(3, 2)) console.log(.includes(19, 1)) console.log(.includes(46, -1)) console.log(.includes(NaN))
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |